Software Testing can be done in two ways such as manually or with automation tools. Each has its own pros and conswhen testing the developed software application to ensure its quality. It checks out whether the application has any critical bugs to affect the process flow and it validates the application that can meet the client requirements effectively. Manual testing consists of executing the workflow process without error and find the application that can run under an possible scenarios.
Effective Manual Testing Process
In Manual Testing, a testing professional initiates the test cases on the software and tests its outcomes. It can be doneeffectively with the following aspects.
Understanding the Software Requirements
Before conducting any software testing, it is most important to understand the requirements of the application. It helps the testers to know what should be tested and classifies the bugs that come as output. It also ensures the error free software that meets out all the client expectations.
Write Test Cases
Writing test cases after knowing the software requirements is a crucial part of manual testing. It guides the testing professional through the step by step process of test functions that checks the entire scenario of the software application. Learning how to write test cases is the best practice in manual testing training and it helps you to know more about it. Here are some tips to write test cases effectively:
Implement The Tests
After writing the appropriate test cases, the tester can begin to test the application. Marking each test as “Passed”, “Failed” or “Truncated” is useful to follow the test cases properly without confusion. It is referred to as TestLodge that makes it easy to add the test details in the execution time.
Generate Perfect Error Reports
Logging the bugs is a significant thing in manual testing to show the defects to the development team. The strong and good bug report log should consist of Strong Title, Reproduce Steps, Priority Level, Actual Results, and Attachment of Error Log. Preparing this error log is used to save the tester time when explaining the bugs in the conference room.
Proving the Importance of Manual Testing
Now, I would like to prove the importance of manual testing and why automation testing can not replace it even it has a bunch of tools.
Manual Testing only fit for Usability Testing
Usability testing requires manual attention as the machine can not identify “good” and “bad” usability of the software The tester can not skip usability testing as it brings numerous amount of risks. Usability testing in the QA process is very much important to ensure the deployment assurance and it is highly needed for human involvement for validating the usability.
Unpredictable results can be tested with Manual Testing
Automation testing can be done only in the “Happy Path” strategy. It implies the functionalities as per the expected happenings and the predicated results. It does not go in deep than the existing test cases and it has opted only for regression tests that require the limited resources. When comes to the whole testing process, automation testing bringfailure in the deployment. But manual testing can take up for the unpredictable results through many possible input ways.
Human are Exploratory Testers
Manual testing can be done by any human as we are partaking in some exploratory testing process. It allows a sense of freedom with detailed hands-on exposure that involves investigating and learning new things. It maximizes the test execution and minimizes the predefined test planning by thoroughly validates the application. It may comprise of scientific thinking as per the trends, funny test outputs, or creative test plan processes. This exploratory testing is useful for responding to the feedback and unaware of the testing sequence.
Manual Testing Assures 100% accurate
Sometimes, the Automation test contains errors if the test cases for the automation process have any bugs. If it has errors in test cases of automation testing, it shows the false outcomes. The result may be as expected but the requirement does not fit at the end. It may create a problem with your team but manual testing can identify the exact errors and assures the proper testing outcomes.
Manual Testing has no technical limitations
Test conditions can be complicated sometimes and it is impossible to apply automation testing in such scenarios. Automation testing has many technical limitations to say, for example, testing of touch screen devices involves the experience of “tap” and “swipe” that can not be done with automation but only with human interaction.
When and Why to apply Manual Testing?
Manual Testing requires more human efforts. But It is not possible to skip or automate some test scenarios. Automation Testing can not cover everything but developing the software requires to be tested anyhow. If the software used by a human, it requires the involvement of humans in any possible condition or level of application testing. Manual testing should be involved in usability problems that allow the testing of flexibility and convenient usage of the application. I did not mean that automation testing is useless. It has many benefits that can not be done with manual testing. It surely adds value to the application where it is not possible with manual testing.
The manual testing helps the testers to understand the entire issues and explore the flexible angles to ensure the quality of the application. Automation testing differs from tool to tool by its cost and benefits. But Manual testing requires only skilled testers who are experienced with hands-on exposures. We provide comprehensive Software Testing Training in Chennai at SLA in both manual and automation testing tools with the certification and job-ready skills.